How to know what you’re looking for in First Book Contests
It’s fall again, or, it will be very soon, and that means a few things for us writers: Most college produced literary magazines reopen for submissions, and the big first book contests are back. But, with contest fees reaching deep into the pocket ($25 to read my book? Is it really that bad?) you have to pick and choose wisely. The major first book awards which have their submission period in the fall are American Poetry Review’s
Honickman First Book Prize in Poetry, with a whopping $3,000 Prize, one of the largest for first books, outdone by Spring’s big buck prize University of Pittsburg Press’s Agnes Lynch Starret Poetry Prize at $5,000. This year’s Honickman judge is none other than our favorite narcissist Tony Hoagland. Why does this matter? Well, in a way it doesn’t, nor does the particular press publishing the winning manuscript, technically. The first answer always given by editors is always “Excellence is our only requirement” or some such blanket statement. But what excellence are they looking for? Robert Pinsky excellence? Fanny Howe excellence? Stephen Dunn excellence? They all are good at what they do, but few presses/journals are truly as eclectic as they claim, and why should they be? Anyway, what I was getting at is that one can reasonably judge that aside from excellence, the judge might like poems similar to their own. This gives you a slight insider track on what to submit. Then comes the bad part, when we realize that many poets like a wide variety of poems, and that your manuscript is up against hundreds of other hopefuls who have been honing their own
brands of excellence and submitted their most excellent (says Bill S. Preston, esquire) poems without regard to the final judge’s own poetry. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t. For instance, Billy Collins selected Spencer Short’s Tremolo for the 2000 National Poetry Series. Don’t get me wrong, it’s a good book, just not exactly that similar to Collins’ work. Honickman’s deadline is October 31st, and the reading fee is $25. Another prestigious first book award is the Yale Series of Younger Poets, which is on the lower end of the reading fees that have been climbing as fast as gas, at only $15, and luminaries such as Carolyn Forche are past winners. Their deadline is November 15th. Now, another little way to toe the waters of a contest you might be interested in submitting to is to take a look at past winners books.
For instance, before I entered the Agnes Lynch Starret prize I bought a copy of the last winner that was available, at the time it was Aaron Smith’s Blue on Blue Ground and while it didn’t really affect my poem choices, nor the outcome, it was an excuse to get a new book from a new voice. Always a fun exercise. So none of these tricks are foolproof, nor do they even make a huge difference most of the time, but you never know. It won’t hurt anything to buy the book of a judge or a past prize winner, and it could be the difference between being eliminated by one of the anonymous readers buried in the thank yous, and being eliminated by the guest judge in the final round. Other first book awards coming up shortly are Boa Editions Ltd.’s A. Poulin Jr. Poetry Prize judged by Jean Valentine, ending November 30th, with an entry fee of $25, and a grand prize of $1,500. Also the 2008 New Issues Poetry Prize judged by the one and only Carl Phillips, with a $15 reading fee and a grand prize of $2,000. The New Issues Poetry Prize deadline is also November 30th.